Main

Motile cilia are used by unicellular and multicellular organisms either to propel themselves through fluid or to move fluid across their surfaces. Ciliary motility is driven by a microtubule-based supramolecular assembly known as the axoneme, which consists of nine doublet microtubules (DMTs) surrounding a central apparatus of two singlet microtubules. DMTs are patterned into repeating 96-nm units by two rows of dynein arms (outer dynein arms (ODAs) and inner dynein arms (IDAs)), up to three T-shaped mechanoregulatory complexes called radial spokes (RSs), the nexin–dynein regulatory complex (N-DRC) that links neighbouring DMTs and a network of coiled coils that regulates the docking and periodicity of the aforementioned complexes. In addition, the DMT lumen is extensively decorated with microtubule inner proteins (MIPs) that bind in varying multiples of the 8-nm tubulin repeat, but with an overall periodicity of 48 nm that is in coherent register with the external 96-nm repeat.

Over the past 20 years, cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET) and cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) have brought our understanding of the axoneme to the molecular level, culminating in a recent atomic model of the 96-nm modular repeat from the green alga C hlamydomonas reinhardtii 1,6. However, corresponding models of mammalian axonemes are incomplete 1,2,3,4,5. For instance, the model of a human DMT from respiratory cilia 1 lacks RS3, a prominent complex present in most ciliated organisms but absent from Chlamydomonas, and does not account for many enzymes or regulatory kinases thought to be anchored to the axoneme 7.

Cryo-EM and cryo-ET have also shown marked variation in axonemal subcomplexes across species and cell types 1,2,3,8,9,10,11,12. This variation reflects the diversity of ciliary form and function in nature, and even within an organism; for instance, ependymal cilia in brain ventricles drive the flow of watery cerebrospinal fluid, whereas respiratory cilia in the trachea propel viscous mucus along the airway surface. Epithelial cilia and sperm flagella have distinct waveforms 13 and vary greatly in length, ranging from a few microns in the respiratory tract to tens or even hundreds of microns in sperm. They also respond differently to mutations in proteins that they are proposed to share. However, the lack of high-resolution structures of axonemes from different mammalian cell types prevents a full understanding of how differences in individual proteins or protein complexes contribute to ciliary diversity in normal function and in disease.

Comparison of epithelial and sperm DMTs

To shed light on the structural diversity of axonemes across different mammalian motile-ciliated cell types, we used single-particle analysis (SPA) cryo-EM to reconstruct the native 96-nm repeat of DMTs from disintegrated axonemes of sperm flagella (Bos taurus) and epithelial cilia isolated from either the oviduct (B. taurus and Homo sapiens) or brain ventricles (Sus scrofa) (Fig. 1, Extended Data Fig. 1a–d, Supplementary Figs. 17, Supplementary Tables 12 and Methods). Separately, we reconstructed the 96-nm repeat from intact porcine (S. scrofa) oviduct cilia using cryo-ET and subtomogram averaging, showing consistency with our SPA structures, especially near the microtubule surfaces (Extended Data Fig. 1e–g and Methods). By comparison of these reconstructions with published maps of human respiratory cilia 1, we define how the structure of the axoneme varies across motile-ciliated cell types of the mammalian body.

Fig. 1: Cryo-EM reconstructions of the 96-nm axonemal repeat of motile cilia from different mammalian cell types.
figure 1

Each panel shows a longitudinal and cross-sectional view of a composite cryo-EM map of a 96-nm repeat unit of a doublet microtubule from bovine sperm flagella (a), bovine oviductal cilia (b), porcine brain ventricle cilia (c) and human respiratory cilia (d). The reconstruction in d is EMD-35888 (ref.  1). Each major axonemal complex is given a unique colour with the doublet microtubule in grey. IJ, inner junction; MAP, microtubule-associated protein; OJ, outer junction.

Our work demonstrates that the DMTs of multiciliated epithelial cells are almost structurally indistinguishable, with differences restricted to the intraluminal tektin bundle and associated proteins RIBC1/2 (Extended Data Fig. 2). The overall similarity of epithelial DMTs reflects the similarity of epithelial cilia in general—they are all approximately 5–10 µm long, consist of an axoneme sheathed by a ciliary membrane and have similar waveform dynamics. Nevertheless, the absence of obvious structural specializations in DMTs from epithelial cilia is somewhat unexpected considering their roles in propelling liquids of very different viscosity, and the different sensitivities of tissues to ciliopathic mutations. For example, genetic ablation of the β-tubulin isotype TUBB4B causes severe loss of tracheal and oviductal cilia in mice, but has no apparent effect on the number, length or beat frequency of brain ependymal cilia 14. Our structural and proteomic data confirm that TUBB4B is the main β-tubulin isotype of pig ependymal DMTs—as it is in all motile cilia examined (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4)—suggesting that differential sensitivity to TUBB4B depletion cannot be explained solely by gross differences in DMT structure.

In contrast to the relatively homogeneous structures of epithelial DMTs, direct comparison of bovine DMTs from three different tissues shows that sperm DMTs have an additional layer of complexity (Fig. 1) that extends to the MIPs that decorate the lumen of axonemal DMTs 2,3 (Extended Data Fig. 2). Our structures further show that ciliary microtubule-associated proteins (CIMAPs) bound close to the external surface of the DMT 2,15 are ubiquitous features of mammalian axonemes but have cilium-specific distribution (Extended Data Fig. 3a,b). For example, CIMAP3 is present in all mammalian axonemes hitherto studied, yet CIMAP2, which binds the same protofilament cleft, is found only in sperm (Extended Data Fig. 3b). These structural observations are supported by both proteomics (Supplementary Table 4) and expression data 16.